Project stakeholders
Main target group of the project are vegetable growers (organic and interested to conversion) who can make practical use of the project outcome. But important users will be as well extension experts (who can facilitate the knowledge transfer towards producers) and local authorities (who can urge and support the implementation of project outcome in their territories farms). All this for the countries directly involved in the project as well as for other countries where the experience can be shared.
|
News
The second year of field experiments in the research farms and the first year of trials in the pilot farms have been concluded. The scientists are now finalising the laboratory analyses and the results evaluation. The next project workshop will be held in Denmark on June and it will be aimed at sharing among the researchers the outcome so far achieved and involve the Danish stakeholders. |
[Ekskursion Slovenia] |
Publications
Seven papers have been submitted and accepted to the OW Congress (Istanbul, October 2014) and ISHS Congress (Brisbanne, August 2014). Papers and/or links will be left available once the Congress proceedings will be published. |
|
Enhancing multifunctional benefits of cover crops - vegetables intercropping
|
Project objectives
The project aims at verifying if the introduction and proper management of living mulch in vegetable production systems allows comparable yields and produce quality in comparison to the sole cropping systems, reducing the use of auxiliary, off-farm, inputs (i.e. plant protections products and fertilizers) and non-renewable energy consumption (i.e. fossil fuel for mechanical weeding). The cover crops – vegetables intercropped farming systems should then perform better in terms of environmental impact and profitability due to production costs reduction.
This hypothesis is tested in a range of European areas where open field organic vegetable production are a relevant activity. Field experiments will be carried out in four CORE Countries (IT, DK, DE and SLO), in sites having different soil characteristics and climatic conditions.
Two yielding crops have been identified, one common for all and one for each of the study areas, according to the following criteria: (i) economic relevance, (ii) season of the cropping cycle and (iii) representativeness as “model” crop of a larger crops group with similar characteristic and to which, the project outcomes can be extended. A range of cover crop families and species are intercropped with the yielding species in function of the typology of “service” they provide and in relation to the agro-ecosystems characteristics in which they are introduced.
Cover crops sowing period, root pruning as well as spacing or yielding crop and cover crop density are the relevant experimental factors that will be investigated in order to optimize the performance of the living mulched agro-ecosystems in comparison to the sole crop systems. The living mulched and the sole crop systems will be compared in terms of yield quality and stability, impact of weed and pests as well as nutrient availability and losses in relation to reduction in the use of off-farm inputs and energy, cost effectiveness and environmental impact. Involving 7 partners of 4 CORE countries, project activities are organized in 6 work packages.
| Expected results and their impact
The main expected result is the development of cropping practices based on intercropping/living mulch tailored for each of the crop/system studied in the different countries. These ready-to-use cropping model will be then disseminated. Organic vegetable producers will benefit from the project outcome as it will supply knowledge on systems to produce organic vegetables with lower use of external inputs (fertilizers, plant protection products, water, energy etc.). It will result in improved farm profitability and more resilient farming systems that grants long-term productivity and produce quality. The organic sector will also benefit from the higher credibility to consumers of the intercropping production methods based on lower external inputs and higher biodiversity.
Rural communities will benefit from the project outcome in terms of improved environmental profile of organic vegetable farms and this will reduce the negative environmental impacts on soil and water. Furthermore, the increase of plant diversity in the field will benefit the biodiversity of natural fauna and microorganisms in the agro-ecosystems.
Consumers will benefit from the project as they will have the chance to choose, among organic production, vegetable with lower environmental impact. Policy makers and standard setters can use the project outcomes for feeding the standards improvement process (as for organic vegetable production EU Regulation is still simplistic) and for the definition of rural development plans and premium schemes.
Overall, the project will increase the body of knowledge about the effect of introduction of the intercropping/living mulch technique in organic vegetable productions on yield and produces quality, environmental impact and off-farm external energy and inputs use reduction for weeds, fertility and pests management. Accordingly, It is expected that the project outcomes will give a contribution in the debate about of the risk of the so called “conventionalization” of organic farming.
Main outcomes at this stage?
The first field experiments were carried out on
cauliflower, leek and artichoke, either on research
farms or pilot (private) farms. The main, preliminary
outcomes available are:
- The introduction of early sown LM (i.e. at crop
transplanting) in cauliflower cropping systems
reduced the yield and the quality. Conversely,
in the late sowed LM (i.e. 2 to 4 weeks after
cauliflower transplanting, according to local
conditions) no significant differences in yield
and yield quality were observed. Permanent
LM strips could represent a feasible option to
design and manage vegetable intercropped
systems.
- In the Northern EU countries, where vegetables
are mainly cultivated in summer, the
continued presence of the living mulch in the
field over winter may reduce the soil mineral
N content during the leaching season in comparison
to the bare soil (after the sole crop).
Consequently, it may contribute to lower the
nitrate leaching risk from the systems. The LM
substitutive design (reduction of crop plant
density to leave room to LM) tended to increase
leaching. This may be due to a lower N
uptake ability of the living mulch compared to
the cauliflower that was replaced. Whereas the
addition design, where the living mulch was
introduced in-between the rows of cauliflower
(same crop plant density), tended to reduce
leaching. However, since these outcomes are
strongly depended by the climatic conditions,
we need to verify these preliminary evidences
in the light of the next year results.
CORE organic II
- Living mulch sowing time and the choice of the cultivar had a
key role in the competitive
success of the cash crop against
both weeds and living mulch. Preliminary outcomes showed
that late sowing of the LM ensured an unfavourable environment
for weeds avoiding crop suppression. Moreover, our findings
indicated similarities in competitiveness between hybrid
and open pollinated/local adapted cultivars.
- Preliminary results obtained in the Italian cauliflower ‘scenario’
showed that LM introduction did not affect the infestation of P.
brassicae, showing no detrimental effect of this technique on
pest dynamics. In LM treatments, the P. brassicae parasitisation
by the braconid Cotesia sp. was higher than the no LM
treatment (88 % and 63 %, respectively). LM also showed to
increase the spider and rove beetle populations, while the carabid
activity density was slightly higher in the no living mulch.
|
[Experimental fields visit at CRA ORA]
|
[Farm visit Italy]
|
|
|
Search Organic Eprints
The open archive includes a vast amount of documents on organic certification
Search the open archive
More search options on www.orgprints.org
| |
InterVeg
development and evaluation of the potential advantages and disadvantages of living mulch technique in terms of pest/beneficial interactions, weed and nutrient management and their effect on crop growth, yield, product quality, environmental impact and ecological services within the field
7 partners, 4 countries
Coordinator
Senior researcher Stefano Canali, Agricultural Research Council - Research centre for the soil plant system (CRA-RPS), Italy
Partners
Fabio Tittarelli
Gabriele Campanelli
and Corrado Ciaccia, Research centre for the soil plant system (CRA)
(2 Research Centers: RPS and ORA), Italy
Livia Ortolani
Cristina Micheloni, Associazione Italiana Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Italy
Giovanni Burgio, Università di Bologna, Italy
Peter von Fragstein und Niemsdorff, University of Kassel, Germany
Hanne L. Kristensen, Aarhus University, Denmark
Martina Bavec, University of Maribor, Slovenia |
[Ekskursion Slovenia] |
Short announcements
A field day will be held in May in Italy. Farmers will be invited to visit the pilot farm where living mulched artichoke is grown. |
|